Genetic Determinants of Radiotherapy Resistance in Uveal Melanoma
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62382/jcbt.v3i3.108Keywords:
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Adult, HIV/AIDS, Botswana, Morphology, ImmunophenotypeAbstract
Radiotherapy remains the cornerstone of local treatment for uveal melanoma (UM), achieving high rates of primary tumor control. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients experience disease progression and metastatic relapse, underscoring a fundamental biological limitation of radiotherapy efficacy in this malignancy. Accumulating evidence indicates that radioresistance in UM is not driven by high mutational burden, but rather by a distinctive genetic architecture dominated by chromosomal alterations and adaptive DNA damage response programs. High-risk cytogenetic states in UM, particularly those defined by large-scale chromosomal imbalance, have emerged as key biological contexts shaping radiotherapy tolerance. Rather than acting as passive prognostic markers, these configurations appear to remodel genome maintenance capacity by selectively dampening tumor-suppressive safeguards while favoring DNA damage tolerance and survival-oriented repair responses. In parallel, early oncogenic events that drive tumor initiation indirectly reinforce radioresistance by sustaining pro-survival signaling programs, transcriptional adaptability, and stress resilience. Together, these features establish a cellular state in which radiation-induced damage is accommodated rather than eliminated, permitting clonogenic persistence despite adequate local dose delivery. This review integrates genomic, cytogenetic, and radiobiological evidence to propose a unifying framework in which UM radioresistance arises from coordinated genetic reprogramming of DNA repair and survival pathways. Understanding these determinants is essential for the rational development of radiosensitization strategies and for improving long-term disease control in UM.
Downloads
References
Amaro A, Gangemi R, Piaggio F, Angelini G, Barisione G, Ferrini S, et al. The biology of uveal melanoma. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews. 2017, 36(1), 109-140. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-017-9663-3
Gurayah AA, Peters VA, Jin W, Kalahasty K, Kwon D, Zhao W, et al. Predictors of local recurrence and progression-free survival in Iodine-125 brachytherapy-treated uveal melanomas: A modern institutional study. Ocular Oncology and Pathology. 2022, 8(3), 175-180. DOI: 10.1159/000526771
Dogrusöz M, Ruschel Trasel A, Cao JF, Ҫolak S, van Pelt SI, Kroes WGM, et al. Differential expression of DNA repair genes in prognostically-favorable versus unfavorable uveal melanoma. Cancers (Basel). 2019, 11(8), 1104. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11081104
Seibel I, Cordini D, Rehak M, Hager A, Riechardt AI, Böker A, et al. Local recurrence after primary proton beam therapy in uveal melanoma: Risk factors, retreatment approaches, and outcome. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015, 160(4), 628-636. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.06.017
Mouriaux F, Sanschagrin F, Diorio C, Landreville S, Comoz F, Petit E, et al. Increased HIF-1α expression correlates with cell proliferation and vascular markers CD31 and VEGF-A in uveal melanoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2014, 55(3), 1277-1283. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-13345
Hawkins L, Kalirai H, Aughton K, Hussain RN, Coupland SE, Parsons JL. Understanding and exacerbating the biological response of uveal melanoma to proton beam therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2025, 17(19), 3104. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17193104
Song CW, Kim H, Kim MS, Park HJ, Paek SH, Terezakis S, et al. Role of HIF-1α in the responses of tumors to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Cancer Research and Treatment. 2025, 57(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2024.255
Gear H, Williams H, Kemp EG, Roberts F. BRAF mutations in conjunctival melanoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2004, 45(8), 2484-2488. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0093
Griewank KG, Westekemper H, Murali R, Mach M, Schilling B, Wiesner T, et al. Conjunctival melanomas harbor BRAF and NRAS mutations and copy number changes similar to cutaneous and mucosal melanomas. Clinical Cancer Research. 2013, 19(12), 3143-3152. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0163
Küsters‐Vandevelde HVN, Küsters B, van Engen‐van Grunsven ACH, Groenen PJTA, Wesseling P, Blokx WAM. Primary melanocytic tumors of the central nervous system: A review with focus on molecular aspects. Brain Pathology. 2015, 25(2), 209-226. DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12241
Robertson AG, Shih J, Yau C, Gibb EA, Oba J, Mungall KL, et al. Integrative analysis identifies four molecular and clinical subsets in uveal melanoma. Cancer Cell. 2017, 32(2), 204-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.07.003
Chang AE, Karnell LH, Menck HR. The national cancer data base report on cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma: A summary of 84,836 cases from the past decade. The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Cancer. 1998, 83(8), 1664-1678. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981015)83:8<1664::aid-cncr23>3.0.co;2-g
Singh AD, Turell ME, Topham AK. Uveal melanoma: trends in incidence, treatment, and survival. Ophthalmology. 2011, 118(9), 1881-1885. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.040
Tsotridou E, Loukovitis E, Tsiropoulos GN, Zapsalis K, Pentara I, Tzima K, et al. Radiation treatment methods in uveal melanoma. Medical Hypothesis, Discovery and Innovation in Ophthalmology Journal. 2021, 10(1), 32-42. DOI: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1419
Jager MJ, Shields CL, Cebulla CM, Abdel-Rahman MH, Grossniklaus HE, Stern MH, et al. Uveal melanoma. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers. 2020, 6(1), 24. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-020-0158-0
Khoja L, Atenafu EG, Suciu S, Leyvraz S, Sato T, Marshall E, et al. Meta-analysis in metastatic uveal melanoma to determine progression free and overall survival benchmarks: An international rare cancers initiative (IRCI) ocular melanoma study. Annals of Oncology. 2019, 30(8), 1370-1380. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz176
Lane AM, Kim IK, Gragoudas ES. Survival rates in patients after treatment for metastasis from uveal melanoma. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2018, 136(9), 981-986. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.2466
Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group. The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma: V. Twelve-year mortality rates and prognostic factors: COMS report No. 28. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2006, 124(12), 1684-1693. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.124.12.1684
Kujala E, Makitie T, Kivela T. Very long-term prognosis of patients with malignant uveal melanoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2003, 44(11), 4651-4659. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0538
Laver NV, McLaughlin ME, Duker JS. Ocular melanoma. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2010, 134(12), 1778-1784. DOI: 10.5858/2009-0441-RAR.1
Chan AW, Lin HB, Yacoub I, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Simone 2nd CB. Proton Therapy in uveal melanoma. Cancers (Basel). 2024, 16(20), 3497. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16203497
Jarczak J, Karska-Basta I, Romanowska-Dixon B. Deterioration of visual acuity after brachytherapy and proton therapy of uveal melanoma, and methods of counteracting this complication based on recent publications. Medicina (B. Aires). 2023, 59(6), 1131. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59061131
Wilkinson B, Hill MA, Parsons JL. The cellular response to complex DNA damage induced by ionising radiation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023, 24(5), 4920. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054920
Obacz J, Pastorekova S, Vojtesek B, Hrstka R. Cross-talk between HIF and p53 as mediators of molecular responses to physiological and genotoxic stresses. Molecular Cancer. 2013, 12(1), 93. DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-93
Kim W, Lee SM, Seo D, Kim D, Kim K, Kim E, et al. Cellular stress responses in radiotherapy. Cells. 2019, 8(9), 1105. DOI: 10.3390/cells8091105
Rapoport BL, Anderson R. Realizing the clinical potential of immunogenic cell death in cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019, 20(4), 959. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20040959
Wang Q, Ju XL, Wang JY, Fan Y, Ren MJ, Zhang H. Immunogenic cell death in anticancer chemotherapy and its impact on clinical studies. Cancer Letters. 2018, 438, 17-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.08.028
Demaria S, Formenti SC. Radiation as an immunological adjuvant: Current evidence on dose and fractionation. Frontiers in Oncology. 2012, 2, 153. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00153
Wu QH, You L, Nepovimova E, Heger Z, Wu WD, Kuca K, Adam V. Hypoxia-inducible factors: Master regulators of hypoxic tumor immune escape. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2022, 15(1), 77. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01292-6
Fabian KP, Wolfson B, Hodge JW. From immunogenic cell death to immunogenic modulation: Select chemotherapy regimens induce a spectrum of immune-enhancing activities in the tumor microenvironment. Frontiers in Oncology. 2021, 11, 728018. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.728018
Charkhian H, Tuncer SB, Karaman S, Dağoğlu Sakin RN, Hallaj-Salahipour M. Clinical applications and recent advances in radiotherapy for the management of neoplasia in companion animals. Avicenna Veterinary Research. 2025. DOI: 10.22084/avr.2025.31489.1016
Charkhian H, Karaman S, Sakin RND, Tuncer SB. Radiotherapy-induced skin injuries (RISIs): Mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. International Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research. 2025, 10(4), 157-166. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijcocr.20251004.15
Zhang ZF, Liu X, Chen DW, Yu JM. Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: The dawn of cancer treatment. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2022, 7(1), 258. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-022-01102-y
Zhou BB, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: Putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature. 2000, 408(6811), 433-439. DOI: 10.1038/35044005
Friedberg EC. DNA damage and repair. Nature. 2003, 421(6921), 436-440. DOI: 10.1038/nature01408
Ewens KG, Kanetsky PA, Richards-Yutz J, Purrazzella J, Shields CL, Ganguly T, et al. Chromosome 3 status combined with BAP1 and EIF1AX mutation profiles are associated with metastasis in uveal melanoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2014, 55(8), 5160-5167. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-14550
Yavuzyigitoglu S, Koopmans AE, Verdijk RM, Vaarwater J, Eussen B, van Bodegom A, et al. Uveal melanomas with SF3B1 mutations: A distinct subclass associated with late-onset metastases. Ophthalmology. 2016, 123(5), 1118-1128. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.023
Logani S, Cho AS, Ali BH, Withers HR, McBride WH, Kozlov KL, et al. Single-dose compared with fractionated-dose radiation of the OM431 choroidal melanoma cell line. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1995, 120, 506-510. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)72665-0
Soulières D, Rousseau A, Tardif M, Larochelle M, Tremblay M, Vaillancourt L, et al. The radiosensitivity of uveal melanoma cells and the cell survival curve. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 1995, 233(2), 85-89. DOI: 10.1007/BF00241477
Logani S, Cho AS, Su LD, Withers HR, McBride WH, Hall MO, et al. Effects of gamma radiation on the OM431 human ocular melanoma cell line. Experimental Eye Research. 1995, 60(6), 603-605. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-4835(05)80002-8
van den Aardweg GJ, Naus NC, Verhoeven AC, de Klein A, Luyten GP. Cellular radiosensitivity of primary and metastatic human uveal melanoma cell lines. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2002, 43(8), 2561-2565. PMID: 12147585
van den Aardweg GJ, Kiliç E, de Klein A, Luyten GP. Dose fractionation effects in primary and metastatic human uveal melanoma cell lines. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2003, 44(11), 4660-4664. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0151
Calipel A, Lux AL, Guérin S, Lefaix JL, Laurent C, Bernaudin M, et al. Differential radiosensitivity of uveal melanoma cell lines after X-rays or carbon ions radiation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2015, 56(5), 3085-3094. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15930
Jasińska-Konior K, Pochylczuk K, Czajka E, Michalik M, Romanowska-Dixon B, Swakoń J, et al. Proton beam irradiation inhibits the migration of melanoma cells. PLoS One. 2017, 12(10), e0186002. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186002
Jasińska-Konior K, Wiecheć O, Sarna M, Panek A, Swakoń J, Michalik M, et al. Increased elasticity of melanoma cells after low-LET proton beam due to actin cytoskeleton rearrangements. Scientific Reports. 2011, 9(1), 7008. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43453-7
Hussain RN, Coupland SE, Khzouz J, Kalirai H, Parsons JL. Inhibition of ATM increases the radiosensitivity of uveal melanoma cells to photons and protons. Cancers (Basel). 2020, 12(6), 1388. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061388
Dianov GL, Hübscher U. Mammalian base excision repair: The forgotten archangel. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013, 41(6), 3483-3490. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt076
Caldecott KW. Causes and consequences of DNA single-strand breaks. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2024, 49(1), 68-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2023.11.001
Gohil D, Sarker AH, Roy R. Base excision repair: Mechanisms and impact in biology, disease, and medicine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023, 24(18), 14186. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241814186
Vitti ET, Parsons JL. The radiobiological effects of proton beam therapy: Impact on DNA damage and repair. Cancers (Basel). 2019, 11(7), 946. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11070946
Melia E, Parsons JL. DNA damage and repair dependencies of ionising radiation modalities. Bioscience Reports. 2023, 43(10), BSR20222586. DOI: 10.1042/BSR20222586
Symington LS, Gautier J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annual Review of Genetics. 2011, 45, 247-271. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132435
Hou ZY, Yu TX, Yi QY, Du Y, Zhou LB, Zhao Y, et al. High-complexity of DNA double-strand breaks is key for alternative end-joining choice. Communications Biology. 2024, 7(1), 936. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06640-5
Bétermier M, Bertrand P, Lopez BS. Is non-homologous end-joining really an inherently error-prone process? PLoS Genetics. 2014, 10(1), e1004086. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086
Sadoughi F, Mirsafaei L, Dana PM, Hallajzadeh J, Asemi Z, Mansournia MA, et al. The role of DNA damage response in chemo-and radio-resistance of cancer cells: Can DDR inhibitors sole the problem? DNA Repair (Amst). 2021, 101, 103074. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103074
Moynahan ME, Jasin M. Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2010, 11(3), 196-207. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2851
Carter RJ, Nickson CM, Thompson JM, Kacperek A, Hill MA, Parsons JL. Characterisation of deubiquitylating enzymes in the cellular response to high-LET ionizing radiation and complex DNA damage. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2019, 104(3), 656-665. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.053
Fabbrizi MR, Nickson CM, Hughes JR, Robinson EA, Vaidya K, Rubbi CP, et al. Targeting OGG1 and PARG radiosensitises head and neck cancer cells to high-LET protons through complex DNA damage persistence. Cell Death & Disease. 2024, 15(2), 150. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-024-06541-9
Bright SJ, Manandhar M, Flint DB, Kolachina R, Ben Kacem M, Martinus DK, et al. ATR inhibition radiosensitizes cells through augmented DNA damage and G2 cell cycle arrest abrogation. JCI Insight. 2024, 9(19), e179599 (2024). DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.179599
Nickoloff JA, Sharma N, Taylor L. Clustered DNA double-strand breaks: biological effects and relevance to cancer radiotherapy. Genes (Basel). 2020, 11(1), 99. DOI: 10.3390/genes11010099
Doherty RE, Bryant HE, Valluru MK, Rennie IG, Sisley K. Increased non-homologous end joining makes DNA-PK a promising target for therapeutic intervention in uveal melanoma. Cancers (Basel). 2019, 11(9), 1278. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11091278
Frosina G, Marubbi D, Marcello D, Vecchio D, Daga A. The efficacy and toxicity of ATM inhibition in glioblastoma initiating cells-driven tumor models. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2019, 138, 214-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.04.015
Durant ST, Zheng L, Wang YC, Chen K, Zhang LL, Zhang TW, et al. The brain-penetrant clinical ATM inhibitor AZD1390 radiosensitizes and improves survival of preclinical brain tumor models. Science Advances. 2018, 4(6), eaat1719. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat1719
Carruthers R, Ahmed SU, Strathdee K, Gomez-Roman N, Amoah-Buahin E, Watts C, et al. Abrogation of radioresistance in glioblastoma stem-like cells by inhibition of ATM kinase. Molecular Oncology. 2015, 9(1), 192-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.08.003
Glorieux M, Dok R, Nuyts S. Novel DNA targeted therapies for head and neck cancers: Clinical potential and biomarkers. Oncotarget. 2017, 8(46), 81662-81678. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20953
Kashyap S, Jha J, Singh MK, Singh L, Sen S, Kaur J, et al. DNA damage response proteins and its role in tumor progression of uveal melanoma with patient outcome. Clinical and Translational Oncology. 2020, 22(9), 1472-1480. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02281-x
Mukherjee B, McEllin B, Camacho CV, Tomimatsu N, Sirasanagandala S, Nannepaga S, et al. EGFRvIII and DNA double-strand break repair: A molecular mechanism for radioresistance in glioblastoma. Cancer Research. 2009, 69(10), 4252-9. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4853
Kilic E, Naus NC, van Gils W, Klaver CC, van Til ME, Verbiest MM, et al. Concurrent loss of chromosome arm 1p and chromosome 3 predicts a decreased disease-free survival in uveal melanoma patients. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2005, 46(7), 2253-7. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1460
Dogrusöz M, Jager MJ. Genetic prognostication in uveal melanoma. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2018, 96(4), 331-347. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13580
Cassoux N, Rodrigues MJ, Plancher C, Asselain B, Levy-Gabriel C, Lumbroso-Le Rouic L, et al. Genome-wide profiling is a clinically relevant and affordable prognostic test in posterior uveal melanoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014, 98(6), 769-74. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303867
Damato B, Dopierala J, Klaasen A, van Dijk M, Sibbring J, Coupland SE. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification of uveal melanoma: Correlation with metastatic death. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2009, 50(7), 3048-55. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-3165
Johansson PA, Brooks K, Newell F, Palmer JM, Wilmott JS, Pritchard AL, et al. Whole genome landscapes of uveal melanoma show an ultraviolet radiation signature in iris tumours. Nature Communications. 2020, 11(1), 2408. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16276-8
Anbunathan H, Verstraten R, Singh AD, Harbour JW, Bowcock AM. Integrative copy number analysis of uveal melanoma reveals novel candidate genes involved in tumorigenesis including a tumor suppressor role for PHF10/BAF45a. Clinical Cancer Research. 2019, 25(16), 5156-5166. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3052
Shields CL, Ganguly A, Materin MA, Teixeira L, Mashayekhi A, Swanson LA, et al. Chromosome 3 analysis of uveal melanoma using fine-needle aspiration biopsy at the time of plaque radiotherapy in 140 consecutive cases: The Deborah Iverson, MD, Lectureship. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2007, 125(8), 1017-24. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.125.8.1017
Valizadeh Osalo M, Hosseini P, Charkhian H, Soltanzadeh H, Goharkhany S, Tuncer SB. The prevalence of ADSL (rs3788579) and CYP1A2 (rs17861162) polymorphisms in female breast cancer patients in North-West Iran. Discover Oncology. 2024, 15(1), 59. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-00919-z
Lake SL, Damato BE, Kalirai H, Dodson AR, Taktak AF, Lloyd BH, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis of uveal melanomas reveals that amplification of CNKSR3 is correlated with improved patient survival. The American Journal of Pathology. 2013, 182(3), 678-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.11.036
Harbour JW, Onken MD, Roberson ED, Duan S, Cao L, Worley LA, et al. Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas. Science. 2010, 330(6009), 1410-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1194472
Nishikawa H, Wu W, Koike A, Kojima R, Gomi H, Fukuda M, et al. BRCA1-associated protein 1 interferes with BRCA1/BARD1 RING heterodimer activity. Cancer Research. 2009, 69(1), 111-9. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3355
Jensen DE, Proctor M, Marquis ST, Gardner HP, Ha SI, Chodosh LA, et al. BAP1: A novel ubiquitin hydrolase which binds to the BRCA1 RING finger and enhances BRCA1-mediated cell growth suppression. Oncogene. 1998, 16(9), 1097-112. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201861
Dunn J, Potter M, Rees A, Rünger TM. Activation of the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway and recombination repair in the cellular response to solar ultraviolet light. Cancer Research. 2006, 66(23), 11140-7. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0563
Kennedy RD, D'Andrea AD. The Fanconi Anemia/BRCA pathway: New faces in the crowd. Genes & Development. 2005, 19(24), 2925-40. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1370505
Cohn MA, Kee Y, Haas W, Gygi SP, D'Andrea AD. UAF1 is a subunit of multiple deubiquitinating enzyme complexes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009, 284(8), 5343-51. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M808430200
Volker M, Moné MJ, Karmakar P, van Hoffen A, Schul W, Vermeulen W, et al. Sequential assembly of the nucleotide excision repair factors in vivo. Molecular Cell. 2001, 8(1), 213-24. DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00281-7
Van Raamsdonk CD, Griewank KG, Crosby MB, Garrido MC, Vemula S, Wiesner T, et al. Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010, 363(23), 2191-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000584
Griewank KG, van de Nes J, Schilling B, Moll I, Sucker A, Kakavand H, et al. Genetic and clinico-pathologic analysis of metastatic uveal melanoma. Modern Pathology. 2014, 27(2), 175-83. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.138
Johansson P, Aoude LG, Wadt K, Glasson WJ, Warrier SK, Hewitt AW, et al. Deep sequencing of uveal melanoma identifies a recurrent mutation in PLCB4. Oncotarget. 2016, 7(4), 4624-31. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.6614
Moore AR, Ceraudo E, Sher JJ, Guan Y, Shoushtari AN, Chang MT, et al. Recurrent activating mutations of G-protein-coupled receptor CYSLTR2 in uveal melanoma. Nature Genetics. 2016, 48(6), 675-80. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3549
Markby DW, Onrust R, Bourne HR. Separate GTP binding and GTPase activating domains of a Gα subunit. Science. 1993, 262(5141), 1895-901. DOI: 10.1126/science.8266082
Nell RJ, Versluis M, Cats D, Mei H, Verdijk RM, Kroes WGM, et al. Identification of diagnostic and prognostic genetic alterations in uveal melanoma using RNA sequencing. Scientific Reports. 2025, 15(1), 8167. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90122-z
Oliva M, Rullan AJ, Piulats JM. Uveal melanoma as a target for immune-therapy. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2016, 4(9), 172. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.05.04
Darman RB, Seiler M, Agrawal AA, Lim KH, Peng S, Aird D, et al. Cancer-associated SF3B1 hotspot mutations induce cryptic 3′ splice site selection through use of a different branch point. Cell Reports. 2015, 13(5), 1033-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.053
DeBoever C, Ghia EM, Shepard PJ, Rassenti L, Barrett CL, Jepsen K, et al. Transcriptome sequencing reveals potential mechanism of cryptic 3’splice site selection in SF3B1-mutated cancers. PLoS Computational Biology. 2015, 11(3), e1004105. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004105
Alsafadi S, Houy A, Battistella A, Popova T, Wassef M, Henry E, et al. Cancer-associated SF3B1 mutations affect alternative splicing by promoting alternative branchpoint usage. Nature Communications. 2016, 7, 10615. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10615
Furney SJ, Pedersen M, Gentien D, Dumont AG, Rapinat A, Desjardins L, et al. SF3B1 mutations are associated with alternative splicing in uveal melanoma. Cancer Discovery. 2013, 3(10), 1122-1129. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0330
Harbour JW, Roberson ED, Anbunathan H, Onken MD, Worley LA, Bowcock AM. Recurrent mutations at codon 625 of the splicing factor SF3B1 in uveal melanoma. Nature Genetics. 2013, 45(2), 133-5. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2523
Martin M, Maßhöfer L, Temming P, Rahmann S, Metz C, Bornfeld N, et al. Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic mutations in EIF1AX and SF3B1 in uveal melanoma with disomy 3. Nature Genetics. 2013, 45(8), 933-6. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2674
Hunter SM, Anglesio MS, Ryland GL, Sharma R, Chiew YE, Rowley SM, et al. Molecular profiling of low grade serous ovarian tumours identifies novel candidate driver genes. Oncotarget. 2015, 6(35), 37663-77. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5438
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hamed Charkhian, Motahareh Haji Mohammadi Dehaghani, Seyedeh Negin Seyedeh Negin, Zahra Simaei, Vida Pourteimoor, Zahra Bahararjmand, Seref Bugra Tuncer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.